You are viewing a clip of this video, click to Join. Members, click to Log in.
|
|
||||
When you sign up for Storylogue, you will also enjoy:
testing swf lesson
Oct 01, 2010
Sample swf
Oct 01, 2010
Character - Lesson #2
Mar 27, 2010
Dialogue Study #3 - Ten Traits of Faulty Dialogue Continued
Mar 20, 2010
Character - Lesson #1
Mar 13, 2010
Epilogues Study #1: 9 Uses of Epilogues
Mar 06, 2010
Prologue Study 3: Eleven Ways To Use Prologues.
Feb 27, 2010
Prologue Study 2 - Placement of Prologues
Feb 13, 2010
Dialogue Study 1: The Importance of Dialogue
Feb 06, 2010
Now Playing









Requires
I think I missed it. Or am I being stupid?
Leigh
However, there is a scene in the first season of THE WIRE, where Detectives McNulty and Bunk solve a homicide in five minutes as they recreate the events at the scene of a crime and find crucial evidence, and during this sequence, all they say is "Fuck". Over and over again, varying it slightly, "Fucker", "Mother fucker" and on and on, but nothing else is ever said in the scene.
And it's hysterical. I assume this would be an example of how one can over-use a faulty trait (as in the case of arid language) of dialogue for comedy as this dialogue is also character-neutral and repetitive. Which leads me to wonder how comedic dialogue differs from dramatic, since repetition is such a common trick comedians use.
I would expect the same traits as explained to apply to a narrator even it the narrator isn't a character in the story. Are there any additional traits that apply to such a narrator?
Other than perhaps experts or interviewees I suppose, do these dialogue traits otherwise apply to documentaries?
Best Regards,
KM Tracy